Kweri analyses performance, accessibility, technical SEO and user experience, then tells you what matters most in plain English.
The visual language is deliberately editorial: warm paper, confident typography, restrained colour, authored critique blocks and evidence-led annotations. It should feel closer to a professional review than a diagnostics dashboard.
The system studies the site like a designer, not just a crawler.
Findings are translated into impact, risk and user meaning.
The report tells the owner what to do first, and why.
This is the artefact people will share, trust and pay for. The hierarchy favours verdicts over metrics, with scores supporting the story rather than dominating it.
Your site looks credible, but visitors may struggle to understand what you offer quickly enough. The biggest opportunity is improving clarity above the fold.
Visitors must work too hard before discovering what your business actually does. This creates uncertainty at the exact point they are deciding whether to stay.
The enquiry button competes with secondary navigation and does not feel like the obvious next step.
Reviews and proof points are hidden below multiple sections. Move one credible proof point closer to the opening screen.
This gives Kweri an ownable visual device: screenshots marked up like a calm senior designer's critique. It becomes recognisable in reports, emails, public links and case studies.
The opening line does not explain the service in plain language.
The main action appears after the visitor has already had to interpret the page.
No proof point is visible at the moment of first judgement.
Instead of a control room full of gauges, Kweri tracks the fix → verify → improve loop. The owner should feel momentum, not overwhelm.
Likely caused by new image uploads. Compress hero and gallery images first.
Low effort, likely to improve search result clarity.